Good Glamm Group to cease as a house of brands, sell all assets individually: CEO
Good Glamm Group will no longer operate as a house of brands, CEO Darpan Sanghvi confirms. The company plans to sell MyGlamm, The Moms Co, and others individually. Read full report.

Good Glamm Group Restructures: To Disband House of Brands Model
In a significant strategic shift, Good Glamm Group, once touted as one of India's most promising digital-first beauty and personal care conglomerates, has announced it will cease to operate as a house of brands. The company will sell its individual businesses separately, said Group Founder and CEO Darpan Sanghvi in a recent interview, marking the end of an ambitious consolidation strategy that began in 2021.
“The house of brands strategy worked for a while, but we have reached a point where each brand has matured and now deserves its own strategic path,” Sanghvi stated, underlining a shift in the company’s long-term vision.
Breakdown of the Portfolio and Sale Strategy
Good Glamm Group had rapidly acquired over a dozen companies, creating a portfolio that spanned content, creator platforms, and commerce. The key businesses now being divested include:
-
MyGlamm (beauty brand)
-
The Moms Co (maternity & baby care)
-
St. Botanica (premium wellness)
-
Organic Harvest
-
POPxo & ScoopWhoop (content platforms)
-
Plixxo (influencer platform)
The company is seeking strategic buyers for each brand, with negotiations reportedly at various stages. Sanghvi confirmed that discussions with strategic investors and private equity firms are already underway. Some of the brands are profitable, while others are expected to find better value as standalone entities rather than being tethered to a unified parent company.
From $1.2 Billion Valuation to Restructuring
In 2021, Good Glamm became one of India's fastest unicorns, reaching a $1.2 billion valuation after multiple high-profile acquisitions and a funding round led by Warburg Pincus and Prosus Ventures. At the time, the company promoted a flywheel model integrating content, creators, and commerce—a bold experiment meant to redefine digital commerce in India.
However, as per industry insiders, the company struggled to integrate its acquisitions effectively, leading to operational inefficiencies and brand identity dilution.
“The flywheel was an ambitious idea, but the synergies didn’t translate into revenue uplift at the scale expected,” said Ankur Bhatia, retail analyst at Technopak Advisors.
The Market Context: Shift from Blitzscaling to Profitability
The move comes amid a broader recalibration in the Indian startup ecosystem, especially within the D2C (direct-to-consumer) and e-commerce segments. Investors are increasingly favoring unit economics and profitability over aggressive expansion and valuations.
Recent years have seen several well-funded startups such as Licious, Boat, and Mamaearth restructure operations, reduce burn rates, and focus on core business verticals. Good Glamm’s decision is seen as an extension of this market realignment.
“This is a classic pivot away from blitzscaling. It shows maturity and market realism,” said Deepika Narayan, Partner at Fireside Ventures. “Many D2C brands are realizing the value is in depth, not breadth.”
What Went Wrong With the House of Brands Model?
Good Glamm’s house of brands strategy was inspired by global success stories like Unilever and Procter & Gamble, aiming to offer shared backend synergies, common data stacks, and unified marketing. But the strategy often struggled to scale efficiently in the Indian context, especially in the digital-first and influencer-driven markets.
Challenges included:
-
Brand cannibalization
-
Inefficient central operations
-
Inconsistent product positioning
-
Delayed synergies from M&A integrations
Insiders suggest that cultural mismatches between acquired startups and the central leadership team also hampered cohesion.
Investor Outlook and Exit Strategy
The company’s investors, which include marquee names like Bessemer Venture Partners, Amazon, and Trifecta Capital, are reportedly supportive of the new strategy. The asset sale is being seen as a partial exit for early investors and a course correction rather than a distress sale.
Good Glamm Group is expected to complete the divestments by early 2026, and Sanghvi has hinted that he might stay on in a strategic advisory role or pivot to other entrepreneurial ventures post-sale.
“Our investors understand that unlocking value today means optimizing each brand’s individual potential. That’s where the real value now lies,” said Sanghvi.
End of an Era, Beginning of a New Playbook
Good Glamm’s strategic overhaul underscores the end of an era for India’s content-commerce D2C experiments. While the house of brands model may not have played out as planned, it leaves behind a trail of strong individual businesses that are now poised for more focused growth.
The move could become a template for other digital-first conglomerates facing similar structural inefficiencies. With profitability, specialization, and streamlined operations becoming the new buzzwords, Good Glamm’s pivot could mark the next phase in the evolution of India’s consumer internet landscape.
What's Your Reaction?






